<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>duckminifarm.com Blog &#187; English</title>
	<atom:link href="http://duckminifarm.com/blog/index.php/tag/english/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://duckminifarm.com/blog</link>
	<description>Life on the Farm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:53:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>An Archaic Language</title>
		<link>http://duckminifarm.com/blog/2010/02/17/an-archaic-language/</link>
		<comments>http://duckminifarm.com/blog/2010/02/17/an-archaic-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vocabulary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duckminifarm.com/blog/2010/02/17/an-archaic-language/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like most homeschoolers we have a few vintage and antique readers around the house, including reprints of McGuffey. 
After glancing through the 4th reader, I&#8217;m almost convinced that 19th century English will be as incomprehensible as Old English in a few decades&#8230;.except perhaps among the homeschoolers who grow up on these relics.   It&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most homeschoolers we have a few vintage and antique readers around the house, including reprints of McGuffey. </p>
<p>After glancing through the 4th reader, I&#8217;m almost convinced that 19th century English will be as incomprehensible as Old English in a few decades&#8230;.except perhaps among the homeschoolers who grow up on these relics.   It&#8217;s just amazing to me how quickly our language has changed&#8230;perhaps degenerated is a better word. Simplification is not necessarily a bad thing, but I wonder if our ability to express ourselves has diminished.  </p>
<p>Certainly our vocabulary has.</p>
<p>I hv to wndr how lng it wl b bfr we all rt lk ths?  Lts of kds alrdy do. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://duckminifarm.com/blog/2010/02/17/an-archaic-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.243 seconds -->

